Friday, February 6, 2009

The Game Is On


While millions of people have lost their job or are having their hours cut back, the Congress debates the Stimulus Bill. The debate attempts to address concerns of Republican legislatures about the amount of money being spent, but the real reason for the debate is politics. The Bush administration would not have seen the same debate had they purposed a Stimulus Bill before leaving the White House, but Bush and his administration had their heads in the sand. The situation now is beyond economics, it is what it is, just plain old fashion politics.

Regardless of how much money is spent by the Federal Government to stimulate our domestic economy, unless there are changes in the regulatory environment in banking and the investment banking industries, very little if any improvement will be realized in the efficiency of the capital markets. The problem of the conflict of interest remains concerning the rating agencies and underwriters, and the methodology used in the rating of structured debt instruments such as mortgage-backed bonds. This problem of bond ratings for structured debt may appear small to those outside the workings of the capital markets, but it is just enough to keep the housing market from getting back on its feet. The same is true for car loans and manufactured housing. The ability to finance consumer debt is critical to a healthy economy in the 21st century.

The second part of the economic problem is the amount of money being spent to import oil and goods made in China. Without a plan to reduce the wealth that is being exported to pay for the oil and goods made overseas, the domestic economy will continue to find difficulties. Money spent on infrastructure is probably the best bang for the buck along with cutting taxes for people in the lower tax brackets. Cutting corporate taxes at this point, in my opinion, will have very little stimulative effect. People and families making less than $50,000 a year could do more for the overall economy if they did not have to pay any income taxes until this economy got back to near full employment. People on Social Security should have their tax burden eliminated as they are not saving their money, but using almost every dollar to survive.

The state governments need this Stimulus Bill as much if not more than the Federal Government because it is the state governments that are being forced to cut payrolls and eliminate jobs for teachers, police and fire fighters.

Hopefully, by next week sometime a Stimulus Bill will be passed by the Congress. That is only a start. Much work needs to be done to correct the regulatory environment on Wall Street and rebuild the Securities & Exchange Commission.

Stay tuned.

2 comments:

LceeL said...

I am so angry that the distractions - like the temperature of the Oval Office - are getting the attention and yet the real issues - regulation, renewed lending, etc. - are lost in the power struggles in Congress. I wonder how much of this persistent obstructionism would survive if regulations existed that all communications To and From Congress were public. PUBLIC.

moneythoughts said...

You are so right!

Almost 600,000 jobs lost in January and the talking heads on TV news want to talk about the temperature in the Oval office and the fact that President Obama and some members of his administration took off their suit coats in the Oval Office. Taking off a suit coat is not only done to make people more comfortable, but it has a useful purpose in getting the discussion going when the President takes his coat off it helps to build an atmosphere of teamwork. We all take our suit coats off to get to work, like in so many offices around the world. President Bush had his chicken-shit rules for his administration and that was fine for him, now it is a new man's turn to run things and most men take off their suit coat when they really get down to work in an office. Maybe if President Bush had taken off his suit coat he might have been able to think without Cheney pulling the strings.